Redshift Observatory

System Table Tracker

System view pg_catalog.sys_external_query_detail version 1.0.54239 / 2023-08-04

schema name column data type
pg_catalog sys_external_query_detail child_query_sequence int4
pg_catalog sys_external_query_detail duration int8
pg_catalog sys_external_query_detail end_time timestamp
pg_catalog sys_external_query_detail external_query_text text
pg_catalog sys_external_query_detail file_format text
pg_catalog sys_external_query_detail file_location text
pg_catalog sys_external_query_detail qualified_partitions int4
pg_catalog sys_external_query_detail query_id int8
pg_catalog sys_external_query_detail returned_bytes int8
pg_catalog sys_external_query_detail returned_rows int8
pg_catalog sys_external_query_detail scanned_files int8
pg_catalog sys_external_query_detail segment_id int4
pg_catalog sys_external_query_detail source_type char(32)
pg_catalog sys_external_query_detail start_time timestamp
pg_catalog sys_external_query_detail table_name text
pg_catalog sys_external_query_detail total_partitions int4
pg_catalog sys_external_query_detail transaction_id int8
pg_catalog sys_external_query_detail user_id int4
pg_catalog sys_external_query_detail warning_message char(4000)

View Text

Error: describing system view <sys_external_query_detail> is disabled.

Note the AWS are as you see here censoring the SQL of more recent system tables views. This is problematic, as the docs are no good, and so it's not uncommon to need to view the text to make sense of the output. I am of the view AWS, at least as far as Redshift are concerned, has a culture of secrecy and I see this as more of the same. I can see absolutely no reason or benefit, for users, for censoring the view text.



Home 3D Друк Blog Bring-Up Times Consultancy Cross-Region Benchmarks Email Forums IRC Mailing Lists Reddit Redshift Price Tracker Redshift Version Tracker Redshift Workbench System Table Tracker The Known Universe Twitter White Papers